Shebeen or not shebeen?

For the last month, there has been a furore going on at the Parliament buildings. Roads have been closed off, protesters have marched, waved placards and made demands, and the Namibian newspaper has featured the issue on its front page almost daily. The problem? At the beginning of June, the government ordered the closure of all shebeens that do not have liquor licenses.

Shebeens are endemic here. Usually small, one room structures with outlandish names, they crop up like mushrooms across urban and rural landscapes. My friend in Opuwo says that there are two sorts of building that are constructed on an almost weekly basis there – churches and shebeens, and there never seem to be too many of either for the general population.

There are two sides of the shebeen story. They are the major form of small business, and believe me, there isn’t much else in the way of enterprise going on. The unemployment rate is extremely high, and for the owners, shebeens pay to feed their families, and to send their children to school.

However, they do contribute considerably, of course, to Namibia’s alcohol problem. They are also considered to be a major factor in the spread of HIV – people go out, they get drunk, they meet someone, they have sex, too drunk and reckless to think about protection. There was a recent outcry in Walvis Bay because children were running to the Mayor’s office to complain about the noise from the shebeens. The question was raised – where are their parents? Well, where do you think?

So in the name of tackling the problem of alcohol abuse, the government has decided to crack down. As the Namibian has pointed out, however, what is the difference between the alcohol consumed at legal shebeens, and that knocked back at illegal ones? It’s widely held that the matter of liquor licenses is simply a revenue-generator for the government.

I don’t know why the shebeen owners who are facing closure can’t go and get themselves a license. They’ve had since 2002 to do it – four years’ notice doesn’t seem unreasonable. Also, it seems to me that this would solve the problem, pretty much. However, they seem to have taken the whole thing very badly, and have made the pilgrimage to Windhoek to protest, spending the money they could have spent on a license on the travel costs. I’m all for the right to protest. No problem there. I just don’t think they have a case.

They have now been camping outside the parliament building for two weeks, during which time, presumably, their businesses are bringing in no money, the local alcoholics are undergoing cold turkey, and their children are going shoeless to school. I drove past them the other day, and they seem to be having lots of fun, shouting, doing laundry, and sitting about in the sun, drinking beer.

Things are getting a bit fraught now, though, because the shebeen owners appear to be treating the parliament buildings with ‘disrespect’, and this is not going down well with the population in general. Bear in mind, this country is relatively newly independent, and its institutions of power are held in high esteem, even if those wielding the power are not.

So, in the opinion of many, Thursday’s slaughtering, dismembering and braaing of a cow on the lawn outside the chamber of representatives was a meal too far.

5 Responses to “Shebeen or not shebeen?”

  1. Bill Says:

    How strange! Perhaps they have lost sight of the original purpose of the demonstrations and it’s just become a big (drunken?) party. Perhaps there is a (legitimate?) concern that the government’s attempt to regulate the business will become heavy-handed. I’m sure there is a cultural memory of colonial rule in which the government was oppressive, and that may be a (misplaced?) concern now. All these question marks, because I can’t claim to understand it.

  2. Jennifer C Says:

    It probably has something to do with the restrictions that licences impose — such as closing hours and cleanliness laws etc. Such restrictions could make the shebeens unviable. I’m sure it has more to do with the immediate practicalities of the matter rather than with traumatic colonial memory. After all, those of the West seem infatuated with a dominance and submission society –aka wage slavery — and don’t seem concerned with being colonised by the business class of their own socieites. These kinds of things rarely appear to bother anyone unless the measures imposed are draconian in some way.

  3. Ria Says:

    Did you hear the World Service programme about alcohol (link here)? The last part was very disturbing - illegal breweries in Kenya that had led to blindness and death.

    (God, I hate the World Service - they make such interesting programmes just when I need to get out of my car. Sometimes I pull over just before my destination so that I can hear the end of the programme.)

  4. Rachie Says:

    Bill - I\’m sure that they didn\’t lose sight of it. There just wasn\’t much else to do when sitting for hours outside the parliament buildings!

    Jennifer - I see you point, but I never thought that it was because bad memories of colonialism. I assumed that it was because they resented having restrictions put upon them by the government, and seeing as they have the right to protest, they did. One of the demonstrators was adamant that if they closed the unlicensed shebeens, the government owed them a job. Skewed thinking as far as I\’m concerned. Also, seeing as that many shebeen owners can manage to adhere to the restriction (which aren\’t rigidly enforced) without too much trouble, I still don\’t think they have a case.

    Ria - no I didn\’t. I\’ll try and download it. I don\’t get the world service -maybe I should tune in!

  5. Bill Says:

    Thanks, Rachie and Jennifer, for helping me understand. Upon reading some news reports I see that it’s largely an issue of bureaucracy and administration. Seems that license issuance under the Liquor Act requires documentation of ownership, among other things, which may be difficult to obtain. I agree with Rachie that it seems these concerns should have been addressed back when the Liquor Act became law, but again there may be reasons of which I’m unaware. Whether there would be ongoing regulatory issues, for cleanliness or hours of operation, I don’t know - we have them in Boston but I do know it’s not all the same in Namibia.

Leave a Reply